Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting

Title
Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting
Authors
Keywords
Primary outcome, Protocols, Registries, Publications, Randomized controlled trials, Selective reporting
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 87-94
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2017-07-28
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.010

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started