4.7 Article

Genetic and Histopathologic Intertumor Heterogeneity in Primary Aldosteronism

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages 1792-1796

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-4007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK106618, R01 DK107407]
  2. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation [2015085]
  3. National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K23HL111771]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04711] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Whether primary aldosteronism (PA) is the consequence of a monoclonal or multiclonal process is unclear. Case Description: A 48-year-old man with severe bilateral PA refractory to medical therapy underwent unilateral adrenalectomy of the dominant adrenal. Although computed tomography showed three left-sided cortical nodules, postsurgical histopathology and genetic analysis revealed five different adrenocortical adenomas. Two zona fasciculata (ZF)-like aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) each harbored distinct known somatic KCNJ5 mutations (L168R and T158A). A zona glomerulosa-like APA harbored a known CACNA1D G403R somatic mutation, whereas a zona reticularis-like adenoma, which was grossly black in pigmentation with histologic characteristics more associated with cortisol-producing adenomas, expressed CYP11B2, CYP17, and DHEA-ST by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and harbored no known somatic mutations. The fifth adenoma was ZF-type, negative for CYP11B2 and CYP17 IHC, and harbored no known somatic mutations. Conclusions: This case highlights complex intertumor heterogeneity in histology, steroidogenesis, and somatic mutations in multiple adrenocortical adenomas arising in a single patient with PA. These findings suggest that the syndrome of PA can involve heterogeneous and multiclonal functional adrenal adenomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available