4.1 Article

An investigation into the relationship between thickness variations and manufacturing techniques of mouthguards

Journal

DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 14-21

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/edt.12192

Keywords

maxillofacial trauma; sports dentistry; mouthguard thickness; custom mouthguards; thermoforming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to measure the finished thickness of a single identical 4-mm EVA mouthguard model from a large fabricated sample group and to evaluate the degree of material thinning and variations during the fabrication process. Materials and methodsTwenty boxes were distributed to dental technician participants, each containing five duplicated dental models (n=100), alongside 5x4mm mouthguard blanks and a questionnaire. The mouthguards were measured using electronic callipers (resolution: 0.01mm) at three specific points. The five thickest and thinnest mouthguards were examined using a CT scanner to describe the surface typography unique to each mouthguard, highlighting dimensional thinning patterns during the fabrication process. ResultsOf the three measurement points, the anterior sulcus point of the mouthguard showed a significant degree of variation (up to 34% coefficient of variation), in finished mouthguard thickness between individuals. The mean thickness of the mouthguards in the anterior region was 1.62 +/- 0.38mm with a range of 0.77-2.80mm. This variation was also evident in the occlusion and posterior lingual regions but to a lesser extent (up to 12.2% and 9.8% variations, respectively). ConclusionThis study highlights variability in the finished thickness of the mouthguards especially in the anterior sulcus region measurement point, both within and between individuals. At the anterior region measurement point of the mouthguard, the mean thickness was 1.62mm, equating to an overall material thinning of 59.5% when using a single 4-mm EVA blank. This degree of thinning is comparative to previous single operator research studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available