4.6 Article

Measuring satisfaction and anesthesia related outcomes in a surgical day care centre: A three-year single-centre observational study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 15-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.09.007

Keywords

Ambulatory care; Outpatient surgery; Patient satisfaction; Patient reported outcome measures

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction and patient reported anaesthesia related outcome parameters after outpatient surgery. Design: A three-year (2013-2016) observational study. Setting: A surgical day care centre embedded in a tertiary care, university hospital. Patients: Adult Dutch-speaking patients who underwent surgery under general or regional anaesthesia on an outpatient basis (n = 5424). Interventions: A questionnaire was developed to evaluate patients' satisfaction with care during their hospitalisation in the surgical day centre, as well as to assess their reports of anaesthesia related outcomes. Measurements: Various aspects of care were measured, including care by nurses, care by doctors, organisational and safety items. Variation in satisfaction and surgery and anaesthesia related outcomes as a function of different categories (gender, age, education, type of anaesthesia, discipline and era) were also investigated. Main results: Confirmatory factor analysis showed an excellent fit to the hypothesized factors of the survey. Satisfaction scores were very high for different aspects of care, resulting in 98% of patients being (very) satisfied (59.1% very satisfied, 38.9% satisfied). Male (p = 0.0003), higher educated (p < 0.0001) and older patients (p < 0.0001) were more likely to be very satisfied. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were frequent (nausea: 13.9%, vomiting: 3.3%), and more present in female than in male patients (p < 0.0001). Pain scores at the PACU differed among disciplines (p < 0.0001) were higher in female patients compared to male patients (3.41% versus 2.54%, p < 0.0001) and after general anaesthesia compared to regional anaesthesia (3.25% versus 0.39%, p < 0.0001) and decreased with higher age (p = 0.0001) and education level (p = 0.0033). Conclusions: Whereas satisfaction with all aspects of care is generally high, the results regarding pain and PONV should inspire quality improvement initiatives. The questionnaire developed in this study can be a vehicle to assess and improve the quality of care in surgical day care centres. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available