4.6 Article

Validation of an analytical method for simultaneous high-precision measurements of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants using a gas chromatography-barrier discharge detector system

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1480, Issue -, Pages 62-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.11.024

Keywords

Barrier ionization discharge (BID); Carbon dioxide (CO2); Gas chromatography (GC); Greenhouse gas (GHG); Method validation; Nitrous oxide (N2O)

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) through the Research project of national interest PRIN [957/Ric - Prot. 2012PTZAMC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) emit CO2 and N2O, which may lead to climate change and global warming. Over the last few years, awareness of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from WWTPs has increased. Moreover, the development of valid, reliable, and high-throughput analytical methods for simultaneous gas analysis is an essential requirement for environmental applications. In the present study, an analytical method based on a gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a barrier ionization discharge (BID) detector was developed for the first time. This new method simultaneously analyses CO2 and N2O and has a precision, measured in terms of relative standard of variation RSD%, equal to or less than 6.6% and 5.1%, respectively. The method's detection limits are 5.3 ppm, for CO2 and 62.0 ppb, for N2O. The method's selectivity, linearity, accuracy, repeatability, intermediate precision, limit of detection and limit of quantification were good at trace concentration levels. After validation, the method was applied to a real case of N2O and CO2 emissions from a WWIP, confirming its suitability as a standard procedure for simultaneous GHG analysis in environmental samples containing CO2 levels less than 12,000 mg/L. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available