4.3 Article

Cataract surgery practices in the United States Veterans Health Administration

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 543-551

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To describe current cataract surgery practices within the United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Setting: Veterans Health Administration hospitals in the U.S. Design: Retrospective data analysis. Methods: An initial e-mail containing a link to an anonymous 32-question survey of cataract surgery practices was sent to participants in May 2016. Two reminder e-mails were sent to nonresponders 1 week and 2 weeks after the initial survey was sent; the remaining nonresponders were called twice over a 2-week period. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The response rate was 75% (67/89). Cataract surgeons routinely ordered preoperative testing in 29 (45%) of 65 sections and preoperative consultations in 26 (39%) of 66 sections. In 22 (33%) of 66 sections, cataract surgeons administered intracameral antibiotics. In 61 (92%) of 66 sections, cataract surgeons used toric intraocular lenses (IOLs). In 20 (30%) of 66 sections, cataract surgeons used multifocal 10Ls. Cataract surgeons in 6 (9%) of 66 sections performed femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery. In 6 (9%) of 66 sections, cataract surgeons performed immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery. Forty-nine (74%) ophthalmology chiefs reported a high level of satisfaction with Veterans Affairs ophthalmology. Conclusions: The survey results indicate that in cataract surgery in the VHA, routine preoperative testing is commonly performed and emerging practices, such as femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery and immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery, have limited roles. The results of this survey could benchmark future trends in U.S. cataract surgery practices, especially in teaching hospital settings. (C) 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available