Journal
JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 352, Issue -, Pages 171-181Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.05.003
Keywords
Hydrogenation; MoS2; Ni-promotion; Hydrotreating; Sulfide catalysts; Heavy oils
Categories
Funding
- Chevron Energy Technology Company
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The reaction network and elementary steps of the hydrogenation of phenanthrene are explored on parent and Ni-promoted MoS2/gamma-Al2O3. Two pathways were identified, i.e., Path 1: Phenanthrene reversible arrow 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene (DiHPhe) -> 1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydro-phenanthrene (asymOHPhe), and Path 2: Phenanthrene -> 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenanthrene (TetHPhe) -> 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydrophenan threne. The steps TetHPhe -> asymOHPhe (hydrogenation), and DiHPhe -> TetHPhe (hydrogenation-isomerization) become notable at phenanthrene conversions above 20%. The reaction preferentially proceeds via Path 1 (90% selectivity) on MoS2/Al2O3. Ni promotion (Ni/(Ni + Mo) molar ratio of 0.3 at the edges on MoS2) increases the hydrogenation activity per active edge twofold and leads to 50% selectivity to both pathways. The reaction orders in H-2 vary from similar to 0.8 on MoS2/Al2O3 to similar to 1.2 on Ni-MoS2/Al2O3, whereas the reaction orders in phenanthrene (similar to 0.6) hardly depend on Ni promotion. The reaction orders in H2S are zero on MoS2/Al2O3 and slightly negative on Ni-MoS2/Al2O3. DFT calculations indicate that phenanthrene is preferentially adsorbed parallel to the basal planes, while H is located at the edges perpendicular to the basal planes. Theory also suggests that Ni atoms, incorporated preferentially on the S-edges, increase the stability of hydrogenated intermediates. Hydrogenation of phenanthrene proceeds through quasi-equilibrated adsorption of the reactants followed by consecutive addition of hydrogen pairs to the adsorbed hydrocarbon. The rate determining steps for the formation of DiHPhe and TetHPhe are the addition of the first and second hydrogen pair, respectively. The concentration of SH groups (activated H at the edges) increases with Ni promotion linearly correlating the rates of Path 1 and Path 2, albeit with different functions. The enhancing effect of Ni on Path 2 is attributed to accelerated hydrogen addition to adsorbed hydrocarbons without important changes in their coverages. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available