4.3 Article

Effects of exogenous hydrogen sulfide on the proliferation and invasion of human Bladder cancer cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 829-832

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_423_17

Keywords

Bladder cancer; hydrogen sulfide; invasion; proliferation

Categories

Funding

  1. Key project of science and technology research of Henan Provincial Department of Education [15A320045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of exogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on the proliferation and invasion of human bladder cancer cells. Methods: Human bladder cancer EJ cells were cultured and then treated with sodium bisulfide (NaHS) (100 mu mol/L for low dosage, 200 mu mol/L for moderate dosage, 400 mu mol/L for high dosage). The differences on proliferation and invasion of EJ cells were detected among different groups with MTT and transwell invasion assays. The differences in the expression levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 among the groups were detected with Western blot. Results: Cell proliferation activity was elevated by exogenous NaHS, with significantly statistical difference compared to the blank control group (P < 0.05). With the increased NaHS concentration, the EJ cell proliferation activity presented a statistically significant trend of increase, showing comparative differences among different groups (P < 0.05). Exogenous NaHS could also improve the invasion ability of bladder cancer EJ cells, which was significantly enhanced with increased NaHS dose (P < 0.001). The levels of MMP2 and MMP9 in EJ cells were significantly upregulated with the increased NaHS dose (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Exogenous H2S may promote cell proliferation and invasion by upregulating the expression level of MMP2 and MMP9 in human bladder cancer EJ cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available