Forest and substrate type drive bryophyte distribution in the Alps

Understanding the main factors driving bryophyte communities in forests is a worthwhile research area as it provides a framework within which to evaluate effective management options. Previous studies elucidated the role of forest structure, substrate, and climate, but their effect in a wide environmental context encompassing several types of forests is still unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of climate, stand structure, substrates (tree trunks, deadwood, forest floor), and different forest types for species richness, species composition, and cover of bryophytes. Seven different types of Alpine forests dominated by spruce, larch-stone pine, silver-fir, Scots pine, oak, beech, and alder were selected. Bryophytes were sampled on tree trunks, deadwood, and forest floor. The importance of forest type, substrate, climate, and forest structure was determined by variance partitioning. Species richness and species composition were best explained by substrate (respectively 13% and 11%) and by forest type (respectively 13% and 11%). The bryophyte cover was primarily explained by the forest type (24%), and to a lesser extent by the climatic factors and stand structure. Overall, these results suggest that in this region ecologically based forest management might focus their efforts in protecting all the forest types and associated substrates. This means that forests of less economic value should also be preserved, and that acceptable silvicultural options should pay attention to the naturally available substrates. Too often, deadwood availability was a limiting substrate for bryophytes.