4.6 Article

Comparison of 3 Routes of Administration of Tranexamic Acid on Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 2738-2743

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.059

Keywords

intravenous; topical; oral; tranexamic acid; total knee arthroplasty; hemoglobin loss

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The mode of administration for tranexamic acid (TXA) to significantly reduce the decrease in hemoglobin (Hb), number of transfusions, relevant costs, and side effects in patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been resolved. Methods: A total of 560 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA were randomized into 4 groups: intravenous group (140 patients receiving 2 doses of 20 mg/kg intravenous TXA), topical group (140 patients administered 3.0 g topical TXA), oral group (140 patients given 2 doses of 20 mg/kg oral TXA), and a control group (140 patients not given TXA). The primary outcomes included postoperative 48-hour Hb loss and drainage volume, number of transfusions, transfusion and TXA costs, and thromboembolic complications. Secondary outcomes were postoperative inpatient time and wound healing 3 weeks after TKA. Results: Baseline data among the 4 groups were similar. The 48-hour Hb loss and drainage volume in the intravenous, topical, and oral groups were significantly less (P <.05) than those in the control group, and the latter had significantly more transfusions and transfusion costs than the other 3 groups (P <.05). The TXA cost was lowest in the oral group comparedwiththat in the topical and intravenous groups (P<.05). No differences in thromboembolic complications, postoperative inpatient time, orwound healing were observed among the groups. However, wound dehiscence and continuous wound discharge occurred in the topical group. Conclusion: All the 3 modes of TXA administration significantly reduced postoperative Hb loss, the number of transfusions, and transfusion costs compared with those in the control group. No pulmonary embolism or infection was observed. Oral TXA is recommended because it provided a similar clinical benefit and resulted in the lowest TXA cost compared with the other 2 modes of TXA administration. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available