4.5 Article

The identification of poultry processing in archaeological ceramic vessels using in-situ isotope references for organic residue analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 179-192

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.12.006

Keywords

Poultry; Lipid; Stable isotopes; Organic residue analysis; Anglo-Saxon; Pottery; GC-MS; GC-c-IRMS

Funding

  1. Arts and Humanities Research Council as part of the project Cultural and Scientific Perspectives of Human-Chicken Interactions [AH/L006979/1]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) of Brazil
  3. AHRC [AH/L006979/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/L006979/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poultry products are rarely considered when reconstructing pottery use through organic residue analysis, impinging upon our understanding of the changing role of these animals in the past. Here we evaluate an isotopic approach for distinguishing chicken fats from other animal products. We compare the carbon isotopes of fatty acids extracted from modern tissues and archaeological bones and demonstrate that archaeological bones from contexts associated with pottery provide suitable reference ranges for distinguishing omnivorous animal products (e.g. pigs vs. chickens) in pots. When applied to pottery from the Anglo-Saxon site of Flixborough, England, we succeeded in identifying residues derived from chicken fats that otherwise could not be distinguished from other monogastric and ruminant animals using modern reference values only. This provides the first direct evidence for the processing of poultry or their products in pottery. The results highlight the utility of 'in-situ' archaeological bone lipids to identify omnivorous animal-derived lipids in archaeological ceramic vessels. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available