4.6 Article

Electrolyte-resistant epoxy for bonding batteries based on sandwich structures

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 135, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.46059

Keywords

adhesives; batteries and fuel cells; mechanical properties; swelling

Funding

  1. Department of Energy ARPA-E [DE-AR0000383]
  2. Corning Foundation
  3. Corning Faculty Fellowship in Materials Science and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adhesives that are stable in Li-ion battery electrolytes are required to realize the potential of new battery designs that integrate structural elements with energy storage. Here, several polymers, commercial adhesives, and sealants were investigated to bond and seal a Li-ion battery sandwich panel. Gravimetric electrolyte uptake measurements were compared with Hansen solubility parameters to predict long-term durability of the materials exposed to battery electrolyte. The durability of adhesively bonded joints with an epoxy adhesive, which was selected as the lowest electrolyte uptake material, was examined using single lap shear strength tests and three-point bending tests in a fabricated sandwich panel. The strength of the epoxy decreased after exposure to battery electrolyte due to solvent uptake in the bond. The addition of lithium hexafluorophosphate to the ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate mixture severely decreased the strength with respect to the pure solvents. In device testing, the sandwich panel did not show any visible damage or leakage when loaded to above 1000 N during three-point bending tests. Using sol extraction measurements and differential scanning calorimetry analyses, the optimized curing temperature for the epoxy adhesive ranged from 80 to 100 degrees C. At these temperatures, the cured adhesive had a highly crosslinked structure with low sol extraction. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available