4.6 Article

Dynamics of processes during the deposition of ZrO2 films by controlled reactive high-power impulse magnetron sputtering: A modelling study

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4996186

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [15-00859Y]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A time-dependent parametric model was applied to controlled reactive high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) depositions of stoichiometric ZrO2 films, carried out in our laboratories, (i) to clarify the complicated dynamics of the processes on the target and substrate surfaces during voltage pulses, and (ii) to corroborate the importance of the O-2 inlet configuration (position and direction) which strongly affects the O-2 dissociation in the discharge and the chemisorption flux of oxygen atoms and molecules onto the substrate. The repetition frequency was 500 Hz at the deposition-averaged target power densities of 25 Wcm(-2), being close to a target power density applicable in industrial HiPIMS systems, and 50 Wcm(-2) with a pulse-averaged target power density up to 2 kWcm(-2). The pulse duration was 50 mu s. For the experimental conditions with the tosubstrate O-2 inlets, the deposition-averaged target power density of 50 Wcm(-2), and the oxygen partial pressure of 0.05 Pa (being close to the mean value during controlled depositions), our model predicts a low compound fraction, changing between 8% and 12%, in the target surface layer at an almost constant high compound fraction, changing between 92% and 93%, in the substrate surface layer during the pulse period (2000 ls). The calculated deposition rate of 89 nm/min for these films is in good agreement with the measured value of 80 nm/min achieved for optically transparent stoichiometric ZrO2 films prepared under these conditions. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available