4.2 Article

LCFA Uptake and FAT/CD36: molecular cloning, tissue expression and mRNA expression responses to dietary oil sources in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus)

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 572-582

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2017.1361828

Keywords

FAT/CD36; cloning; tissue expression; dietary oil sources; grass carp (C idellus)

Funding

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [31201990]
  2. Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province China [2014JY0088]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Northwest AF University] [QN2011104]
  4. [2017JM3026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) plays an important role in trans-membrane uptake of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) and has been identified and described in many organisms, while little is known about this gene in freshwater fish, and especially in the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). In this study, the uptake of LCFA in hepatocytes of C. idellus was firstly determined and then FAT/CD36 gene was cloned; then the gene was sequenced and mRNA levels from different tissues and the effect of dietary oils on its expression were determined. Present data showed that trans-membrane absorption of LCFA was related to the type and concentration of fatty acids (FAs) and it could be inhibited by specific membrane uptake inhibitors. The FAT/CD36 isolated from grass carp contained 1422 bp and the open reading frame was predicted to have 1403 bp (GenBank access number: KU361231.1). FAT/ CD36 was highly expressed in the brain and its lowest expression was in the gills. FAT/CD36 expression in white muscle was up-regulated when fish were fed with groundnut oil, whereas it was downregulated in fish fed fish and linseed oils, respectively. These results indicated n-3 PUFA might inhibit the FAT/CD36 mRNA expression and therefore the oxidation of FAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available