4.7 Article

Detection of fluorine using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1966-1974

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ja00200a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the National Sustainability Programme II [LQ1601]
  2. CEITEC Nano Research Infrastructure (MEYS CR) [LM2015041]
  3. CEITEC Brno University of Technology
  4. Academy of Finland [292558]
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [292558, 292558] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In general, the detection of F and other halogens is challenging through conventional techniques. In this paper, various approaches for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of F using the laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique were demonstrated. In LIBS, fluorine detection can be realized by means of atomic lines and molecular bands. For the purposes of our experiment, two sets of pellets with various contents of CaF2, CaCO3 and cellulose were analyzed using a lab-based LIBS system under a He atmosphere. The fluorine atomic line at 685.60 nm was correlated with CaF signals proving their close relationship. Consequently, the limits of detection were determined for both analytical signals. Moreover, conditions necessary for the quantification of F via CaF band signals were estimated. The dependence of the CaF signal on the varying ratio of Ca and F contents was investigated. Finally, a chip of a real CaF2 crystal was prepared and its surface was mapped with Raman and LIBS systems. The obtained elemental and molecular maps showed good numerical correlations. Thus, the yielded results validated the possibility to substitute the fluorine atomic line by non-conventional CaF molecular bands in the qualitative and quantitative LIBS analysis of fluorine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available