- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How to do a systematic review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
International Journal of Stroke
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 138-156
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2017-11-17
DOI
10.1177/1747493017743796
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research
- (2017) Eivind Berge et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry
- (2017) Rohit Borah et al. BMJ Open
- Top 10 research priorities relating to stroke nursing: a rigorous approach to establish a national nurse-led research agenda
- (2016) Anne Rowat et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
- (2016) Paul Garner et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
- (2016) Paul Garner et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Upper Limb Outcome Measures Used in Stroke Rehabilitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review
- (2016) Leire Santisteban et al. PLoS One
- Top 10 research priorities relating to stroke nursing
- (2015) Alex Pollock et al. International Journal of Stroke
- What's in a name? The challenge of describing interventions in systematic reviews: analysis of a random sample of reviews of non-pharmacological stroke interventions
- (2015) T. C. Hoffmann et al. BMJ Open
- World Stroke Organization Global Stroke Services Guidelines and Action Plan
- (2014) Patrice Lindsay et al. International Journal of Stroke
- Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
- (2014) Maarten Boers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
- (2014) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Test Accuracy of Cognitive Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Dementia and Multidomain Cognitive Impairment in Stroke
- (2014) Rosalind Lees et al. STROKE
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Research Priority Setting: A Summary of the 2012 NINDS Stroke Planning Meeting Report
- (2013) B. G. Vickrey et al. STROKE
- Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials
- (2013) T. C. Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review
- (2012) Monika Kastner et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke
- (2012) Emma J. Boger et al. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
- Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research
- (2012) Julia Kreis et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- People with Aphasia: Capacity to Consent, Research Participation and Intervention Inequalities
- (2012) Marian C. Brady et al. International Journal of Stroke
- From What We Know to What We Do: Translating Stroke Rehabilitation Research into Practice
- (2012) Marion F. Walker et al. International Journal of Stroke
- Top 10 Research Priorities Relating to Life after Stroke – Consensus from Stroke Survivors, Caregivers, and Health Professionals
- (2012) Alex Pollock et al. International Journal of Stroke
- Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: A case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders
- (2012) Michelle C. Weir et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke
- (2012) Alex Pollock et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies
- (2012) Joanne Yaffe et al. PLoS One
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
- (2012) Paula R Williamson et al. Trials
- Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies
- (2011) Mary Dixon-Woods BMC Medicine
- Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2011) Fiona Coupar et al. CLINICAL REHABILITATION
- Stroke rehabilitation
- (2011) Peter Langhorne et al. LANCET
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
- Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
- (2010) Rebecca Ganann et al. Implementation Science
- GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- (2010) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An international registry of systematic-review protocols
- (2010) Alison Booth et al. LANCET
- Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process
- (2010) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. PLoS One
- Stroke survivors' experiences of rehabilitation: A systematic review of qualitative studies
- (2010) Hanne Peoples et al. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
- (2009) Elaine Barnett-Page et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- What treatment packages do UK physiotherapists use to treat postural control and mobility problems after stroke?
- (2009) S. F. Tyson et al. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2009) Sarah T Pendlebury et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review
- (2009) Valery L Feigin et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- What is Bobath? A survey of UK stroke physiotherapists' perceptions of the content of the Bobath concept to treat postural control and mobility problems after stroke
- (2008) S. F. Tyson et al. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
- Informal primary carers of stroke survivors living at home–challenges, satisfactions and coping: A systematic review of qualitative studies
- (2008) Nan Greenwood et al. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
- (2008) Peter Craig et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started