4.4 Article

Construct Validity of Accelerometry-Derived Force to Quantify Basketball Movement Patterns

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 14, Pages 1090-1096

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-119224

Keywords

workloads; wearable sensors; time-motion analysis; training load

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the construct validity of accelerometry-derived net force to quantify the external demands of basketball movements. Twenty-eight basketballers completed the Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (Yo-Yo-IR1) and basketball exercise simulation test (BEST). Intensity was quantified using accelerometry-derived average net force (AvF (Net) ) and PlayerLoad (TM) per minute (PL/min). Within-player correlations were determined between intensity and running speed during Yo-Yo-IR1. Measured AvF (Net) was determined for movements during the BEST and predicted AvF (Net) was calculated using movement speed and correlations from Yo-Yo-IR1. Relationships between AvF (Net) and running speed during Yo-Yo-IR1 were nearly perfect (r (2) =0.95, 95% CI: 0.94-0.96; p<0.001) and stronger than correlations between running speed and PL/min (r (2) =0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87; p<0.001). Differences between measured and predicted AvF (Net) were small during jogging and running (<1%), but large for basketball movements including jumping, change-of-direction and shuffling (15%-41%). As hypothesised, AvF (Net) differed by playing position (11%-16%; p <0.001) and reflected the additional demand upon players with larger body mass and lower movement efficiency. Both sprint speed and AvF (Net) reduced during the course of the BEST ( p 0.013). These findings confirm the construct validity of AvF (Net) to quantify the external demand of basketball movements. Accelerometry-derived net force has the potential to quantify the external demands of basketballers during training and competition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available