4.7 Article

Failure mechanism and numerical simulation of zonal disintegration around a deep tunnel under high stress

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.004

Keywords

Deep rock mass; Zonal disintegration; Geomechanical model test; Numerical simulation; Failure mechanics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of PR China [51279093, 41172268, 51509145]
  2. National major research and development program of PR China [2016YFC0401804]
  3. preliminary research project of the underground experimental project for the geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste of PR China [YK-KY-J-2015-25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zonal disintegration phenomena in deep rock mass will appear with the increase of underground engineering depth which is widely different from shallow cavern. In order to reveal the formation mechanism of zonal disintegration, the geomechanical model test and numerical simulation of zonal disintegration are carried out respectively. Taking the deep tunnel of Dingji coal mine in China's Huainan coal mine as engineering background, a 3D geomechanical model test is carried out relying on the high stress 3D loading test system. The zonal disintegration phenomenon is observed, and the oscillation law of displacement and strain are measured. Based on the strain gradient theory and continuum damage mechanics, the zonal disintegration elastic damage-softening model is established. The relationship between rock failure and energy dissipation is analyzed. According to the strain energy density theory, the zonal disintegration energy damage failure criterion based on strain gradient is established. A numerical analysis method for zonal disintegration is proposed, the zonal disintegration calculation program is developed based on a commercial finite element code. The results of numerical simulation and the 3D geomechanical model test are basically consistent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available