4.7 Article

Continuous monitoring of API content, API distribution and crushing strength after tableting via near-infrared chemical imaging

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 518, Issue 1-2, Pages 130-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.12.003

Keywords

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR); Chemical imaging; Tableting; Process analytical technology (PAT); Homogeneity

Funding

  1. Austrian COMET Program under the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth
  3. State of Styria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Near-infrared chemical imaging (NIR-CI) with high-speed cameras based on the push-broom acquisition principle is a rapidly-evolving and can be used for a variety of purposes, from classification (and sorting) of products to mapping spatial distribution of materials. The present study examined if NIR-CI is suitable for tablet manufacturing. To that end, the tablets were introduced into the CI system via a flat belt conveyor. A formulation, which consisted of 4 wt.%-6 wt.% caffeine, 5 wt.% crospovidone as a disintegrant, 88 wt.%-90 wt.% lactose as a filler and 1 wt.% magnesium stearate as a lubricator, was tableted at compression forces ranging from 5 kN to 30 kN. The intra-and inter-tablet homogeneity of caffeine and the tablet's hardness were analyzed via NIR-CI. For the homogeneity evaluation, two methods were applied: standard deviation (SD) and distributional homogeneity index (DHI). The results showed that the SD of caffeine in a single tablet increased with an increase in the caffeine content. This was attributed to natural variations in a binary mixture of caffeine and excipients. Overall, the chosen NIR-CI setup has strong potential to be transferred to the production scale to monitor all tablets in a production stream. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available