Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic techniques in predicting inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) exposure. The sample size was deteimined based on a pilot study. This prospective clinical series study included 59 third molar extraction sites with any of seven previously suggested panoramic signs of IAN exposure. The diagnosis of nerve exposure was done on panoramic and CBCT images. Molars were extracted and nerve exposure was evaluated clinically. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CBCT method, and sensitivity and PPV of panoramic method were estimated). The panoramic and CBCT methods correctly classified 67.7% and 93.3%, respectively, of 60 cases. This difference was statistically significant (chi(2) = 13.333, P = 0.000). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CBCT were 97.4%, 85.7%, 92.7%, and 94.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of panoramic radiography were 67.8% and 97.6%, respectively. The signs with the highest sensitivity were interruption of the mandibular canal border and abrupt canal narrowing. None of the Pell and Gregory criteria, molar angulations, or three-dimensional canal apex relationships was significantly associated with clinically confirmed IAN exposure. Panoramic radiography may miss about one-third of exposure cases, but a positive panoramic diagnosis is most likely to be a real exposure and should be taken seriously.