4.3 Article

Differentiated correction on the signal intensity dependence of GasBench II-IRMS from blank effect and instrument nonlinear effect

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 422, Issue -, Pages 80-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.08.012

Keywords

GasBench II; delta C-13; Signal intensity dependence; Blank effect; Instrument nonlinear effect

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0503904, 2016YFC0500102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470500, 41671257, 41571130043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continuous-Flow Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (CF-IRMS) coupled with a GasBench II was designed to rapidly analyze delta C-13 in carbonate or CO2 in air. The dependence of measured delta C-13 (delta C-13(m)) on signal intensity (peak area or peak height) was the main error source resulting from blank effect of samples and/or instrument itself effect. To determine the reasons and origins of signal intensity dependence, eight signal intensity gradients for two carbonate (delta C-13 values were -49.64 and 1.61%., respectively) and a gas mixture of 0.3% CO2 in He (delta C-13 = -19.32%.) standards were made respectively. The results showed that there was obvious signal intensity dependence, in particular when sample amount (peak area) was smaller. Given that the dependence was caused by blank effect and/or instrument nonlinear effect, without considering the blank effect, the signal intensity dependence could not be eliminated directly by the instrument nonlinear correction (empirical equation) methods However, it could be eliminated by blank correction (indirect subtraction method). In practice, blank effect should be corrected first, and then the instrument nonlinear effect. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available