4.7 Article

Experimental and first principle studies on hydrogen desorption behavior of graphene nanofibre catalyzed MgH2

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 960-968

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.210

Keywords

Hydrogen storage; MgH2; Carbon nanostructure; DFT; Gaussian 03

Funding

  1. University Grants Commission (Obama-Singh 21st Century Knowledge Initiative (OSI))
  2. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (Mission mode project on Hydrogen Storage)
  3. DST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the combination of experiment and first-principles theory, we have evaluated and explored the catalytic effects of graphitic nanofibres for hydrogen desorption behaviour in magnesium hydride. Helical form of graphene nanofibres (HGNF) have larger surface area, curved configuration and high density of graphene layers resulting in large quantity of exposed carbon sheet edges. Therefore they are found to considerably improve hydrogen desorption from MgH2 at lower temperatures compared to graphene (onset desorption temperature of MgH2 catalyzed by HGNF is 45 degrees C lower as compared to MgH2 catalyzed by graphene). Using density functional theory, we find that graphene sheet edges, both the zigzag and armchair type, can weaken Mg-H bonds in magnesium hydride. When the MgH2 is catalyzed with higher electronegative and reactive graphene edge of graphene, the electron transfer occurs from Mg to carbon, due to which MgH2 is dissociated into hydrogen and Mg-H component. The Mg gets bonded with the graphene edge carbon atoms in the form of C-Mg-H and C-H bonds. In the as formed C-Mg-H, the graphene edges grab more electronic charge as compared to the normal charge donation of Mg to H. This leads to the weakening of the Mg H bond, causing hydrogen to desorbs at lower temperatures. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available