4.1 Article

Ponatinib in Japanese patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia, a phase 1/2 study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 385-397

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-017-2238-9

Keywords

Ponatinib; CML; Japanese population; Ph plus ALL; Phase 1/2

Categories

Funding

  1. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K09461] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this ongoing Phase 1/2 study (NCT01667133), we evaluated ponatinib and assessed its recommended dose in Japanese patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+)ALL) resistant/intolerant to ae1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The primary endpoints were safety of the recommended dose (Phase 1) and major cytogenetic response (MCyR) by 12 months in chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) patients or major hematologic response (MaHR) by 6 months in patients with advanced phase disease (Phase 2). MCyR was achieved/maintained by 12 months in 65% of CP-CML patients; MaHR was achieved by 6 months in 61% of patients with advanced phase disease. The most common nonhematologic grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) was hypertension (37%); common hematologic grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (57%), neutropenia (34%), and leukopenia (26%). Overall, five (14%) patients experienced arterial occlusive events (AOEs); no grade 5 AOEs were reported. The steady-state accumulation ratio of ponatinib (based on area under the curve) ranged from 2.6 (15 mg/day) to 1.3 (45 mg/day). In summary, ponatinib demonstrated efficacy in Japanese patients with CML and Ph(+)ALL resistant/intolerant to prior TKI treatment; safety data support a recommended starting dose of 45 mg/day in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available