4.7 Review

Does mathematics contribute to the nanofluid debate?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 279-288

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.03.118

Keywords

Nanofluids; Brownian motion; Thermophoresis; Boundary layer; Similarity solutions; Heat transfer

Funding

  1. la Caixa foundation
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [MTM2014-56218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent experimental evidence has clearly demonstrated that nanofluids do not provide the greatly enhanced heat transfer predicted in the past. Despite seemingly conclusive proof there is still a great deal of current mathematical research asserting the opposite result. In this paper we scrutinise the mathematical work and demonstrate that the disagreement can be traced to a number of issues. These include the incorrect formulation of the governing equations; the use of parameter values orders of magnitude different to the true values (some requiring nanoparticle volume fractions greater than unity and nanoparticles smaller than atoms); model choices that are based on permitting a reduction using similarity variables as opposed to representing an actual physical situation; presentation of results using different scalings for each fluid. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available