4.5 Article

Sorption studies of yttrium(III) ions on surfaces of nano-thorium(IV) oxide and nano-zirconium( IV) oxide

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-017-1589-3

Keywords

Yttrium; Isotherm; Kinetic model; Thermodynamic parameters

Funding

  1. UGC MRP Grant [MRP-MAJOR-CHEM-2013-15298, 43-185/2014-(SR)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sorption of yttrium on nano-thorium oxide and zirconium oxide was carried out as a function of pH, contact time, concentration, temperature and co-ions. The effect of initial yttrium ion concentration has been investigated in the range of 0.5-50ppm for 1.0mg of sorbent dosages. Maximum sorption of 10.5mg/g in case of nano-thorium oxide and 18.0mg/g in case of nano-zirconium oxide was noticed from the solution of initial metal ion concentration 0.5ppm, temperature of 298K, pH 6.9, shaking time of 120min (nano-thorium oxide) and contact time of 50min (nano-zirconium oxide) for the yttrium ion sorption. Sorption followed both Dubinin-Radushkevich and Langmuir isotherms. The free energy of sorption was found to be 8.77kJ/mol (yttrium(III) vs nano-thorium dioxide) and 18.4kJ/mol (yttrium(III) vs nano-zirconium oxide) using Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm. Sorption increased with increase in temperature in the studied temperature range. Sorption was endothermic. And the values of H degrees, S degrees and G degrees were also evaluated. Pseudo-second-order equation fitted for the sorption kinetics. Reichenberg equation was used to explain the diffusion process. The effects of co-ions on sorptions were also investigated. BET surface areas of sorbent particles were 33m(2)/g for nano-zirconium oxide and 25m(2)/g for nano-thorium oxide. X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy data revealed that the size of the sorbent particles was 4.7 and 15.5nm for nano-thorium dioxide and nano-zirconium dioxide, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available