4.1 Article

Association between pioglitazone use and the risk of bladder cancer among subjects with diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis

Publisher

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CP202670

Keywords

pioglitazone; bladder cancer; meta-analysis; diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Previous epidemiological studies reported inconsistent results regarding the association between pioglitazone use and the risk of bladder cancer (BC). We conducted a dose-response metaanalysis to assess this association. Methods: PUBMED and EMBASE databases were searched through August 2015. Pooled results derived from a random-effects model, and the dose-response analyses were conducted for the association between cumulative dose or duration of pioglitazone use and BC risk. Results: 14 studies were included. After comparing ever use with never use of pioglitazone, an increased risk of BC (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.25) was present, and there was no significant heterogeneity between studies (P for heterogeneity = 0.54, I2 = 0.0%). Every 12 months increase (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03 -1.30) or 10 g increase (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02 -1.09) in pioglitazone use was marginally associated with elevated BC risk. The evidence of linear relationships was found for the cumulative dose of pioglitazone and BC risk, and a nonlinear curve for association between the duration of pioglitazone use and the risk of BC was revealed. Subgroup analyses revealed that an increased risk of BC for pioglitazone use was observed in European male subjects with more than 12 months of pioglitazone use and in the multivariate adjusted group. Conclusions: Pioglitazone use among subjects with diabetes mellitus increases BC risk mildly. More studies are needed to investigate the association between the cumulative dose of pioglitazone use and BC risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available