4.7 Article

Revisiting the Mossbauer Isomer Shifts of the FeMoco Cluster of Nitrogenase and the Cofactor Charge

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 1470-1477

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02540

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [615414]
  3. Icelandic Research Fund [141218051, 162880051]
  4. Univ. of Iceland Research Fund
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [615414] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite decades of research, the structure-activity relationship of nitrogenase is still not understood. Only recently was the full molecular structure of the FeMo cofactor (FeMoco) revealed, but the charge and metal oxidation states of FeMoco have been controversial. With the recent identification of the interstitial atom as a carbide and the more recent revised oxidation-state assignment of the molybdenum atom as Mo(III), here we revisit the Mossbauer properties of FeMoco. By a detailed error analysis of density functional theory-computed isomer shifts and computing isomer shifts relative to the P-cluster, we find that only the charge of [MoFe7S9C](1-) fits the experimental data. In view of the recent Mo(III) identification, the charge of [MoFe7S9C](1-) corresponds to a formal oxidation-state assignment of Mo(III)3Fe(II)4Fe(III), although due to spin delocalization, the physical oxidation state distribution might also be interpreted as Mo(III)1Fe(II)4Fe(2.5)2Fe(III), according to a localized orbital analysis of the M-S = 3/2 broken symmetry solution. These results can be reconciled with the recent spatially resolved anomalous dispersion study by Einsle et al. that suggests the Mo(III)3Fe(II)4Fe(III) distribution, if some spin localization (either through interactions with the protein environment or through vibronic coupling) were to take place.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available