4.7 Article

Collaborative filtering using multiple binary maximum margin matrix factorizations

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 380, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.11.003

Keywords

Collaborative filtering; Matrix completion; Matrix factorization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization (MMMF) has been a successful learning method in collaborative filtering research. For a partially observed ordinal rating matrix, the focus is on determining low-norm latent factor matrices U (of users) and V (of items) so as to simultaneously approximate the observed entries under some loss measure and predict the unobserved entries. When the rating matrix contains only two levels (+/- 1), rows of V can be viewed as points in k-dimensional space and rows of U as decision hyperplanes in this space separating +1 entries from 1 entries. When hinge/smooth hinge loss is the loss function, the hyperplanes act as maximum-margin separator. In MMMF, rating matrix with multiple discrete values is treated by specially extending hinge loss function to suit multiple levels. We view this process as analogous to extending two-class classifier to a unified multi-class classifier. Alternatively, multi-class classifier can be built by arranging multiple two-class classifiers in a hierarchical manner. In this paper, we investigate this aspect for collaborative filtering and propose an efficient and novel framework of multiple bi-level MMMF5. There is substantial saving in computational overhead. We compare our method with nine well-known algorithms on two benchmark datasets and show that our method outperforms these methods on NMAE measure. We also show that our method yields latent factors of lower ranks and the trade-off between empirical and generalization error is low. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available