4.7 Article

Analytical mapping of opinion mining and sentiment analysis research during 2000-2015

Journal

INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 122-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.07.001

Keywords

Affective computing; Opinion mining; Scientometrics; Sentiment analysis

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [INT/MEXICO/P-13/2012]
  2. University Grants Commission India [41 -624/ 2012(SR)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The new transformed read-write Web has resulted in a rapid growth of user generated content on the Web resulting into a huge volume of unstructured data. A substantial part of this data is unstructured text such as reviews and blogs. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis (OMSA) as a research discipline has emerged during last 15 years and provides a methodology to computationally process the unstructured data mainly to extract opinions and identify their sentiments. The relatively new but fast growing research discipline has changed a lot during these years. This paper presents a scientometric analysis of research work done on OMSA during 2000-2016. For the scientometric mapping, research publications indexed in Web of Science (WoS) database are used as input data. The publication data is analyzed computationally to identify year-wise publication pattern, rate of growth of publications, types of authorship of papers on OMSA, collaboration patterns in publications on OMSA, most productive countries, institutions, journals and authors, citation patterns and an year-wise citation reference network, and theme density plots and keyword bursts in OMSA publications during the period. A somewhat detailed manual analysis of the data is also performed to identify popular approaches (machine learning and lexicon-based) used in these publications, levels (document, sentence or aspect-level) of sentiment analysis work done and major application areas of OMSA. The paper presents a detailed analytical mapping of OMSA research work and charts the progress of discipline on various useful parameters. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available