4.7 Article

The extraction efficiency enhancement of polyphenols from Ulmus pumila L. barks by trienzyme-assisted extraction

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 401-408

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.060

Keywords

Ulmus pumila L.; Enzyme-assisted extraction; Response surface methodology; Polyphenols

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201602001, GK261001177]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M580811]
  3. National Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [201510718016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to optimize trienzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) conditions for total polyphenols (TP) from Ulmus pumila barks (UPB). Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize EAE conditions including pH, temperature, and time. The extraction efficiency of three extraction procedures on the TP yield, antioxidant activities and chemical composition of UPB extracts was also compared and characterized. Our results showed that the maximum extraction yield of TP was 16.04 +/- 0.38 mg gallic acid equivalents/g dry weight (GAE/g DW) under the optimum EAE conditions (pH = 4.63, 52.6 degrees C and 62 min). Meanwhile, the EAE gave a higher extraction yield of TP and then a greater in vitro antioxidant capacity compared with those obtained from both ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and conventional heat extraction (CHE). In addition, seven polyphenolic compounds were validated by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis in the extracts at the optimized conditions. The results of this study further confirmed that EAE could be explored as a state-of-the-art environmentally friendly technology for recovering optimum amounts of antioxidant polyphenols from plant sources. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available