4.5 Article

Rethinking the measurement of energy poverty in Europe: A critical analysis of indicators and data

Journal

INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 879-901

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X17699260

Keywords

Energy poverty; Fuel poverty; Vulnerability; Measurement; Indicators

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [313478]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council (White Rose PhD Studentship)
  3. Eaga Charitable Trust
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L024756/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/L024756/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy poverty - which has also been recognised via terms such as fuel poverty' and energy vulnerability' - occurs when a household experiences inadequate levels of energy services in the home. Measuring energy poverty is challenging, as it is a culturally sensitive and private condition, which is temporally and spatially dynamic. This is compounded by the limited availability of appropriate data and indicators, and lack of consensus on how energy poverty should be conceptualised and measured. Statistical indicators of energy poverty are an important and necessary part of the research and policy landscape. They carry great political weight, and are often used to guide the targeting of energy poverty measures - due to their perceived objectivity - with important consequences for both the indoor and built environment of housing. Focussing on the European Union specifically, this paper critically assesses the available statistical options for monitoring energy poverty, whilst also presenting options for improving existing data. This is examined through the lens of vulnerability thinking, by considering the ways in which policies and institutions, the built fabric and everyday practices shape energy use, alongside the manner in which energy poor households experience and address the issue on a day-to-day basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available