3.9 Article

Comparative Analysis of Cutting Efficiency and Surface Maintenance Between Different Types of Implant Drills: An In Vitro Study

Journal

IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 723-729

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000645

Keywords

osteotomy; performance testing; dental implants; tribology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: This study evaluated cutting efficiency (CE) and linear wear of dental implant drills after 450 standardized osteotomies on bovine ribs. Diamond-like carbon-coated steel drills (SG), acid-treated steel drills (EG), and ceramic drills (ZG) were divided into 6 subgroups according to the number of uses. Materials and Methods: A robot-controlled program performed systematic instrumentation, timing, axial loading, and managed feed rate. CE was recorded in a polyurethane resin blank and end wear (VBBmax) was analyzed under stereo microscopy. Results: After osteotomies in beef ribs, CE for the phi 2.0-mm drill decreased 10.2% in SG and 10.9% in ZG; for the phi 3.0-mm drill, CE decreased 30.6% in SG, 8.5% in ZG, and improved in EG. The greatest wear occurred in O2.0-mm drills; ZG drills (phi 3.0 mm) exhibited only edge frittering, as confirmed on scanning electron microscopy. Conclusion: After 50 exposures to mechanical loads, steel and ceramic drills lost CE. Whereas cutting and thermal performance improved in experimental drills, the phi 2.0-mm drill exhibited the most signs of wear proportional to use. These findings suggest that, with the methodology employed, the life of these drills exceeds 50 osteotomies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available