4.3 Review

The non-mammalian MIF superfamily

Journal

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
Volume 222, Issue 3, Pages 473-482

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2016.10.006

Keywords

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF); Homology; Immunity; Parasitology

Categories

Funding

  1. FWO [KaN 1515813N, G015016N]
  2. Strategic Research Program (VUB) [SRP3]
  3. US NIH [RO1AI42310, R01AI110452]
  4. Interuniversity Attraction Pole Program (PAI-IAPN) [P7/41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was first described as a cytokine 50 years ago, and emerged in mammals as a pleiotropic protein with pro-inflammatory, chemotactic, and growth-promoting activities. In addition, MW has gained substantial attention as a pivotal upstream mediator of innate and adaptive immune responses and with pathologic roles in several diseases. Of less importance in mammals is an intrinsic but non-physiologic enzymatic activity that points to MIF's evolution from an ancient defense molecule. Therefore, it is not surprising that mif-like genes also have been found across a range of different organisms including bacteria, plants, protozoa, helminths, molluscs, arthropods, fish, amphibians and birds. While Genebank analysis identifying mif-like genes across species is extensive, contained herein is an overview of the non-mammalian MIF-like proteins that have been most well studied experimentally. For many of these organisms, MIF contributes to an innate defense system or plays a role in development. For parasitic organisms however, MIF appears to function as a virulence factor aiding in the establishment or persistence of infection by modulating the host immune response. Consequently, a combined targeting of both parasitic and host MIF could lead to more effective treatment strategies for parasitic diseases of socioeconomic importance. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available