4.7 Article

Optimal WSN Deployment Models for Air Pollution Monitoring

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 2723-2735

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2017.2658601

Keywords

Air pollution monitoring; detection of threshold crossings; atmospheric dispersion modeling; wireless sensor networks (WSN); deployment; coverage; connectivity

Funding

  1. LABEX IMU [ANR-10-LABX-0088]
  2. Programme Avenir Lyon Saint-Etienne of Universite de Lyon within the program Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-11-IDEX-0007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air pollution has become a major issue in the modern megalopolis because of industrial emissions and increasing urbanization along with traffic jams and the heating/cooling of buildings. Monitoring urban air quality is therefore required by municipalities and the civil society. Current monitoring systems rely on reference sensing stations that are precise but massive, costly, and, therefore, seldom. In this paper, we focus on an alternative or complementary approach, with a network of low cost and autonomic wireless sensors, aiming at a finer spatiotemporal granularity of sensing. Generic deployment models in the literature are not adapted to the stochastic nature of pollution sensing. Our main contribution is to design integer linear programming models that compute sensor deployments capturing both the coverage of pollution under time-varying weather conditions and the connectivity of the infrastructure. We evaluate our deployment models on a real data set of Greater London. We analyze the performance of the proposed models and show that our joint coverage and connectivity formulation is tight and compact, with a reasonable enough execution time. We also conduct extensive simulations to derive engineering insights for effective deployments of air pollution sensors in an urban environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available