4.7 Article

Adaptive Energy Management System Based on a Real-Time Model Predictive Control With Nonuniform Sampling Time for Multiple Energy Storage Electric Vehicle

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 7, Pages 5520-5530

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2016.2638912

Keywords

Batteries; energy management strategy; model predictive control (MPC); nonuniform sampling time; real time; supercapacitors (SCs); urban electric vehicles (EVs)

Funding

  1. Programme Samuel-De Champlain de la 65e session de la Commission permanente de cooperation franco-quebecoise
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of a dual energy storage electric vehicle system mainly depends on the quality of its power and energy managements. A real-time management strategy supported by a model predictive control (MPC) using the nonuniform sampling time concept is developed and fully addressed in this paper. First, the overall multiple energy storage powertrain model including its inner control layer is represented with the energetic macroscopic representation and used to introduce the energy strategy level. The model of the system with its inner control layer is translated into the state-space domain in order to develop an MPC approach. The management algorithm based on mixed short- and long-term predictions is compared to rule-based and constant sampling time MPC strategies in order to assess its performance and its ability to be used in a real vehicle. The real-time simulation results indicate that, compared to other strategies, the proposed MPC strategy can balance the power and the energy of the dual energy storage system more effectively, and reduce the stress on batteries. Moreover, battery and supercapacitor key variables are kept within safety limits, increasing the lifetime of the overall system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available