4.7 Article

Priority Ranking of Critical Uncertainties Affecting Small-Disturbance Stability Using Sensitivity Analysis Techniques

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 2629-2639

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2618347

Keywords

Computational efficiency; probability distribution; sensitivity analysis; small-disturbance stability; uncertainty

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, U.K. [EP/M015025/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/M015025/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M015025/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper critically evaluates a number of sensitivity analysis (SA) techniques to identify the most influential parameters affecting power system small-disturbance stability. SA of uncertain parameters has attracted increased attention with the adoption of deregulated market structure, intermittent energy resources, and new types of loads. Identification of the most influential parameters affecting system stability using SA techniques will facilitate better operation and control with reduced monitoring (only of the parameters of interest) by system operators and stakeholders. In total, nine SA techniques have been described, implemented, and compared in this paper. These can be categorized into three different types: local, screening, and global SA. This comparative analysis highlights their computational complexity and simulation time. The methods have been illustrated using a two-area power system and 68 bus NETS-NYPS test system. The priority ranking of all uncertain parameters has been evaluated, identifying the most critical parameters with respect to the small-signal stability of the test systems. It is shown that for many applications, the Morris screening approach is most suitable, providing a good balance between accuracy and efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available