4.7 Article

Improving VANET Simulation with Calibrated Vehicular Mobility Traces

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 3376-3389

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2017.2690636

Keywords

Vehicular mobility traces; calibration; vehicular ad-hoc networks; performance evaluation; simulation

Funding

  1. Minas Gerais Research Support Foundation (FAPEMIG)
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulation is the most frequently adopted approach for evaluating protocols and algorithms for Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs) and Delay-Tolerant Networks (DTNs). Usually, simulation tools use mobility traces to build the network topology based on the existing contacts between mobile nodes. However, quality of the traces, in terms of spatial and temporal granularity of each entry in the logfile, is a key factor that impacts the network topology directly. Therefore, the reliability of the results depends strongly on the accurate representation of the real network topology by the vehicular mobility model. We show that five widely adopted existing real vehicular mobility traces present gaps, leading to fallible outcomes. In this work, we propose a solution to fill those gaps, leading to more fine-grained traces, which lead to more trustworthy simulation results. We propose and evaluate a data-based solution using clustering algorithms to fill the gaps of real-world traces. In addition, we also present the evaluation results that compare the communication graph of the original and the calibrated traces using network metrics. The results reveal that the gaps do indeed induce network topologies differing from reality, decreasing the quality of the evaluation results. To contribute to the research community, we have made the calibrated traces publicly available, so that other researchers may adopt them to improve their evaluation results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available