4.7 Article

Data-Dependent Label Distribution Learning for Age Estimation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 3846-3858

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2655445

Keywords

Age estimation; subspace learning; label distribution learning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1509206, 61472353]
  2. Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Institute of Frontier Technologies
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1149783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an important and challenging problem in computer vision, face age estimation is typically cast as a classification or regression problem over a set of face samples with respect to several ordinal age labels, which have intrinsically cross-age correlations across adjacent age dimensions. As a result, such correlations usually lead to the age label ambiguities of the face samples. Namely, each face sample is associated with a latent label distribution that encodes the cross-age correlation information on label ambiguities. Motivated by this observation, we propose a totally data-driven label distribution learning approach to adaptively learn the latent label distributions. The proposed approach is capable of effectively discovering the intrinsic age distribution patterns for cross-age correlation analysis on the basis of the local context structures of face samples. Without any prior assumptions on the forms of label distribution learning, our approach is able to flexibly model the sample-specific context aware label distribution properties by solving a multi-task problem, which jointly optimizes the tasks of age-label distribution learning and age prediction for individuals. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available