4.1 Article

Patterns of use and toxicity of new para-halogenated substituted cathinones: 4-CMC (clephedrone), 4-CEC (4-chloroethcatinone) and 4-BMC (brephedrone)

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2621

Keywords

4-BMC; 4-CEC; 4-CMC; cathinones; new psychoactive substances; NPS

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [ISCIII, FIS-FEDER, FIS PI11/01961]
  2. European Commission [JUST/2013/DPIP/AG/4823]
  3. Subdireccio General de Drogodependencies, Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya and Plan Nacional sobre Drogas in Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThis paper aims to present results of the analysis of clephedrone (4-CMC), 4-chloroethcathinone (4-CEC), and brephedrone (4-BMC) on recreational drug markets and a systematic review of all the available information concerning these substances. Material and methodsSamples collected by the drug checking service of the Spanish harm reduction NGOEnergy Control were analyzed and systematic research was conducted. Between June 2014 and October 2016, 1,471 samples with at least one NPS were analyzed, 397 of which contained cathinones. ResultsClephedrone was found in 29 samples, brephedrone in 8, and both were present in 2 samples. 4-Chloroethcathinone was detected in 5 samples. Eleven out of the 47 purchased samples (23.4%) were tested to contain the substance the user expected. Samples received were mainly sold as 3-MMC, MDMA, ketamine, and other cathinones. No literature on the effects or toxicity of these substances was found; the only information available was on internet fora. On many posts, users exhibit concerns about potential toxicity and side effects of using these substances. ConclusionSince the emergence of these substances could prove to be the next step to the cat-and-mouse game existing between drug producers and legislation, further clinical and epidemiological research should be carried out in order to build evidence to support policy for public health issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available