4.6 Article

Proteomic identification of prognostic tumour biomarkers, using chemotherapy-induced cancer-associated fibroblasts

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 816-+

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100808

Keywords

chemotherapy; metabolism; catabolism; cancer-associated fibroblasts; second primary tumours; tumour microenvironment; quantitative proteomics; markers; cancer survival

Funding

  1. University of Manchester
  2. European Union (ERC Advanced Grant)
  3. Breast Cancer Now
  4. Manchester Cancer Research Centre (MCRC)
  5. Cancer Research UK [22308] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer cells grow in highly complex stromal microenvironments, which through metabolic remodelling, catabolism, autophagy and inflammation nurture them and are able to facilitate metastasis and resistance to therapy. However, these changes in the metabolic profile of stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts and their impact on cancer initiation, progression and metastasis are not well-known. This is the first study to provide a comprehensive proteomic portrait of the azathioprine and taxol-induced catabolic state on human stromal fibroblasts, which comprises changes in the expression of metabolic enzymes, myofibroblastic differentiation markers, antioxidants, proteins involved in autophagy, senescence, vesicle trafficking and protein degradation, and inducers of inflammation. Interestingly, many of these features are major contributors to the aging process. A catabolic stroma signature, generated with proteins found differentially up-regulated in taxol-treated fibroblasts, strikingly correlates with recurrence, metastasis and poor patient survival in several solid malignancies. We therefore suggest the inhibition of the catabolic state in healthy cells as a novel approach to improve current chemotherapy efficacies and possibly avoid future carcinogenic processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available