4.5 Article

CYP21A2 mutation update: Comprehensive analysis of databases and published genetic variants

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 5-22

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23351

Keywords

21-hydroxylase deficiency; congenital adrenal hyperplasia; CYP21A2; genetic variants; genotype-phenotype correlation

Funding

  1. Fondos Concursables ANLIS
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires [UBACyT 20020110100005BA]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 2013-1417]
  4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [PIP 2013 11220130100542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a group of autosomal recessive disorders of adrenal steroidogenesis. Disorders in steroid 21-hydroxylation account for over 95% of patients with CAH. Clinically, the 21-hydroxylase deficiency has been classified in a broad spectrum of clinical forms, ranging from severe or classical, to mild late onset or non-classical. Known allelic variants in the disease causing CYP21A2 gene are spread among different sources. Until recently, most variants reported have been identified in the clinical setting, which presumably bias described variants to pathogenic ones, as those found in the CYPAlleles database. Nevertheless, a large number of variants are being described in massive genome projects, many of which are found in dbSNP, but lack functional implications and/or their phenotypic effect. In this work, we gathered a total of 1,340 GVs in the CYP21A2 gene, from which 899 variants were unique and 230 have an effect on human health, and compiled all this information in an integrated database. We also connected CYP21A2 sequence information to phenotypic effects for all available mutations, including double mutants in cis. Data compiled in the present work could help physicians in the genetic counseling of families affected with 21-hydroxylase deficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available