4.3 Article

Formal Neurocognitive Testing in 60 Patients with Congenital Hyperinsulinism

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000481774

Keywords

Congenital hyperinsulinism; Clinical trial; Cognitive development; Children and adolescents; Hypoglycemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI) is hallmarked by persistent hypoketotic hypoglycemia in infancy. In the majority of all patients, CHI is caused by mutations in the KATP channel genes ABCC8 and KCNJ11, but other genes in the insulin-regulatory pathway have also been described. Repeated episodes of hypoglycemia include an increased risk of seizures and intellectual disability. So far, controlled psychometric studies on cognitive, motor, speech, and social-emotional outcome of CHI patients are missing. Until now, neurodevelopmental long-term outcome in CHI patients has only been measured by questionnaires, self-, parental-, or caregiver-administered instruments. Methods: This is a prospective study of 60 patients (median age 3.3 years, range 3 months to 57 years): 48 with a diffuse, 9 with a focal, and 3 with an atypical histology. Neurodevelopmental outcome was assessed using standardized psychological tests and questionnaires. Results: 28 of 60 patients showed developmental delay (46.7%). 9 of 57 patients had cognitive deficits (15.8%), 7 of 26 patients had speech problems (26.9%), and 17 of 44 patients had motor problems (38.6%). In 5 of 53 patients, social-emotional problems were reported. Outcome and the underlying genetic defect were not correlated. Conclusions: Motor problems seem to be prominent in CHI patients. Despite a high incidence of developmental delay, a permanent cognitive defect was only detectable in 9 of 58 patients. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available