4.3 Article

A History of Cow's Milk Allergy Is Associated with Lower Vitamin D Status in Schoolchildren

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
Volume 88, Issue 3-4, Pages 244-250

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000478779

Keywords

Children; Cow's milk allergy; Supplementation; Vitamin D; Vitamin D fortification

Funding

  1. Coca-Cola Company
  2. Finska Lakaresallskapet
  3. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. Foundation for Pediatric Research
  6. Helsinki University Research Funds
  7. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF16OC0021322] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Vitamin D insufficiency is common in children. We aimed to evaluate the main determinants of vitamin D status in Finnish school-aged children, including the history of allergic diseases. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 171 ten-year-olds where serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH] D) levels were measured, and data on food consumption and use of vitamin D supplements were collected. The history of allergic diseases was evaluated with a validated questionnaire. Results: Vitamin D insufficiency (<50 nmol/L) was observed in 16% of the children. In children with a history of cow's milk allergy, the mean 25(OH) D levels were lower than in children without allergy (60.5 +/- 12.6 nmol/L vs. 75.5 +/- 22.3 nmol/L, p = 0.004). Lack of vitamin D supplementation, female gender, non-Caucasian ethnicity, and a history of milk allergy were associated with lower vitamin D status. Conclusion: The vitamin D status in our study sample of Finnish schoolchildren was sufficient, which suggests that health policy strategies - such as the recommendation of vitamin D supplementation and the fortification of food products with vitamin D - have been successful in improving vitamin D status in children. Special concern should be given to children with a history of milk allergy to ensure their vitamin D sufficiency. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available