4.5 Article

Offering A Price Transparency Tool Did Not Reduce Overall Spending Among California Public Employees And Retirees

Journal

HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 1401-1407

Publisher

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1636

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS)
  2. Marshall J. Seidman Center for Studies in Health Economics and Health Care Policy at Harvard Medical School

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insurers, employers, and states increasingly encourage price transparency so that patients can compare health care prices across providers. However, the evidence on whether price transparency tools encourage patients to receive lower-cost care and reduce overall spending remains limited and mixed. We examined the experience of a large insured population that was offered a price transparency tool, focusing on a set of shoppable services (lab tests, office visits, and advanced imaging services). Overall, offering the tool was not associated with lower shoppable services spending. Only 12 percent of employees who were offered the tool used it in the first fifteen months after it was introduced, and use of the tool was not associated with lower prices for lab tests or office visits. The average price paid for imaging services preceded by a price search was 14 percent lower than that paid for imaging services not preceded by a price search. However, only 1 percent of those who received advanced imaging conducted a price search. Simply offering a price transparency tool is not sufficient to meaningfully decrease health care prices or spending.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available