4.6 Article

Using global tide gauge data to validate and improve the representation of extreme sea levels in flood impact studies

Journal

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 34-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.06.007

Keywords

Extreme sea level parameters; GESLA-2 tide gauge data set; DINAS-COAST data set; Major coastal cities flood risk

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [658025]
  3. European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme's Collaborative Project RISES-AM [FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage-603396]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010012] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [658025] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The largest collection of tide gauge records assembled to date, called GESLA-2, has been used to provide reliable extreme sea level parameters at 655 locations around the world. This has enabled a rigorous assessment of the European Union-funded DINAS-COAST (D-C) data set of extreme sea level information for the global coastline that has been used in many published flood impact studies. We find the D-C extreme levels to be generally both too high, compared to those from GESLA-2, and too flat, when plotted as a function of return period. This leads to an over-estimation of the probability of extreme sea levels in the present day for most locations around the world, and also to an over-estimation of the probability of extreme sea levels in the future as sea level rises. A detailed impact study is conducted for the world's largest coastal cities following the approach of Hallegatte et al. (2013), resulting in similar conclusions for these particular locations. We suggest that most previous studies that have relied upon D-C information should be re-assessed in the light of these findings, using more recent modelling-based estimates of extreme sea level information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available