4.7 Article

Direct Observation of Heavy-Tailed Storage Times of Bed Load Tracer Particles Causing Anomalous Superdiffusion

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 44, Issue 24, Pages 12227-12235

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075045

Keywords

sediment transport; anomalous diffusion; heavy-tailed storage times; tracer slowdown

Funding

  1. Bureau of Reclamation Science and Technology Program
  2. CIRES Innovative Research Program grant
  3. Army Research Office grant [47033-EV]
  4. USGS Mendenhall Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A consensus has formed that the step length distribution of fluvial bed load is thin tailed and that the observed anomalous superdiffusion of bed load tracer particles must arise from heavy-tailed resting times. However, heavy-tailed resting times have never been directly observed in the field over multiple floods. Using 9years of data from a large bed load tracer experiment, I show that the spatial variance of the tracer plume scales faster than linearly with integrated excess stream power, indicating anomalous superdiffusion. The superdiffusion is caused by a heavy-tailed distribution of observed storage times that is fit with a truncated Pareto distribution with a tail parameter that is predicted by anomalous diffusion theory. The heavy-tailed distribution of storage times causes the tracer virtual velocity to slow over time, indicated by a sublinear increase in the mean displacement that is predicted by the storage time distribution tail parameter. Plain Language Summary The way a plume of river sediment spreads out depends on the length of particle travel distances and the length of time between episodes of motion. If the probability of long stationary periods is particularly high, the sediment can, somewhat counter-intuitively, spread out faster than expected. This paper presents observational evidence that the burial of sediment in a stream bed can cause this faster than expected spreading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available