“Not pathogenic until proven otherwise”: perspectives of UK clinical genomics professionals toward secondary findings in context of a Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team and the 100,000 Genomes Project
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
“Not pathogenic until proven otherwise”: perspectives of UK clinical genomics professionals toward secondary findings in context of a Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team and the 100,000 Genomes Project
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 320-328
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-10-26
DOI
10.1038/gim.2017.157
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Insights from early experience of a Rare Disease Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team: a qualitative study
- (2017) Elizabeth Ormondroyd et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium
- (2016) Laura M. Amendola et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Sarah S. Kalia et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories
- (2016) Julianne M. O’Daniel et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
- (2016) Michael P. Mackley et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Association of Arrhythmia-Related Genetic Variants With Phenotypes Documented in Electronic Medical Records
- (2016) Sara L. Van Driest et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system
- (2016) Noura S. Abul-Husn et al. SCIENCE
- Freedom of Choice About Incidental Findings Can Frustrate Participants' True Preferences
- (2015) Jennifer Viberg et al. BIOETHICS
- Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research
- (2015) Anna Middleton et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists
- (2015) Kym Boycott et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
- Factors influencing success of clinical genome sequencing across a broad spectrum of disorders
- (2015) Jenny C Taylor et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Attitudes of Genetics Professionals Toward the Return of Incidental Results from Exome and Whole-Genome Sequencing
- (2014) Joon-Ho Yu et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between
- (2014) Gail P. Jarvik et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Return of results: Ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care
- (2014) Wylie Burke et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS
- The hidden harm behind the return of results from personal genome services: a need for rigorous and responsible evaluation
- (2014) A. Cecile J.W. Janssens GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- The unintended implications of blurring the line between research and clinical care in a genomic age
- (2014) Benjamin E Berkman et al. Personalized Medicine
- Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?
- (2013) Catherine Gliwa et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Genetics professionals' perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing
- (2013) Zoe Lohn et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Whole-genome sequencing in health care
- (2013) Carla G van El et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process
- (2013) Carmen Ayuso et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Processes and factors involved in decisions regarding return of incidental genomic findings in research
- (2013) Robert Klitzman et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting
- (2013) Conrad V. Fernandez et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
- (2013) Robert C. Green et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- The Indispensable Role of Professional Judgment in Genomic Medicine
- (2013) Amy L. McGuire et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board Chairs
- (2013) Debra S. Brandt et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Views of Genetics Health Professionals on the Return of Genomic Results
- (2013) Megan E. Grove et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Patient Autonomy and Incidental Findings in Clinical Genomics
- (2013) S. M. Wolf et al. SCIENCE
- “I want to know what's in Pandora's box”: Comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing
- (2012) Anne Townsend et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study
- (2012) AA Lemke et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts
- (2012) Gabrielle M Christenhusz et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing
- (2012) Robert C. Green et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting
- (2012) Nancy R. Downing et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Genomics really gets personal: How exome and whole genome sequencing challenge the ethical framework of human genetics research
- (2011) Holly K. Tabor et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started