4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Scoping of material response under DEMO neutron irradiation: Comparison with fission and influence of nuclear library selection

Journal

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 299-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.06.016

Keywords

Activation and transmutation; DEMO first-wall; Fusion versus fission; Primary knock-on atoms (PKAs); Neutron irradiation; Materials database

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme [633053]
  2. RCUK Energy Programme [EP/P012450/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predictions of material activation inventories are an important input into the operational, safety and environmental assessment of future fusion nuclear plants. Additionally, the neutron-induced transmutation (change) of material composition (inventory) with time, and the creation and evolution of configurational damage from atomic displacements, require precise quantification because they can lead to significant changes in material properties, and thus influence reactor-component lifetime. A comprehensive scoping study has been performed to quantify the activation, transmutation (depletion and build-up) and immediate damage response under neutron irradiation for all naturally occurring elements from hydrogen to bismuth. The resulting database provides a global picture of the response of a material, covering the majority of nuclear technological space, but focussing specifically on typical conditions expected for a demonstration fusion power plant (DEMO). Results from fusion are compared against typical fission conditions for selected fusion relevant materials, demonstrating important differences and confirming that the latter cannot necessarily be relied upon to give accurate scalable experimental predictions of material response in a future fusion reactor. Results from different nuclear data libraries are also compared. (C) 2017 EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available