4.7 Article

Comparison of spray collapses at elevated ambient pressure and flash boiling conditions using multi-hole gasoline direct injector

Journal

FUEL
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages 125-134

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.071

Keywords

Gasoline direct injection; Spray collapse; Jet-air interaction; Flash boiling; Condensation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51636003]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M540940]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the spray characteristics of a five-hole gasoline direct injector were investigated in a constant volume vessel. The absolute ambient pressure ranged from 0.5 to 10.0 bar, and the fuel temperatures were 20 degrees C and 80 degrees C. High-speed imaging and phase Doppler measurement technique were utilized to investigate the spray morphology and the droplet dynamics, respectively. Spray collapses were observed in the near field under the elevated ambient pressure (higher than 1.0 bar) conditions and in the far field under the flash boiling conditions in both macroscopic and microscopic levels. In addition, under the elevated ambient pressure conditions, the droplets at the inner side of the target jet were larger than those at the outer side, due to the increased probability of droplet coalescence as a result of spray collapse. Whilst, slight increase in droplet diameter in the inner side of the target jet was also found under the flash boiling conditions. Furthermore, the near-field collapse at the elevated ambient pressure conditions was attributed to the jet-air interaction, termed as jet-induced spray collapse; and the far-field collapse under the flash boiling conditions was attributed to the dramatic temperature drop and the resultant vapor condensation, termed as condensation-induced spray collapse. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available