4.7 Article

Characterization of coal char surface behavior after a heterogeneous oxidative treatment

Journal

FUEL
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages 154-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.030

Keywords

Char; Oxygen-containing complexes; TPD; FT-IR; NO reduction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476046, 51536002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two typical types of bituminous coal (JN and SH) were employed for thorough devolatilization, then the samples were functionalized by O-2 at 1073 K to different conversion ratios (JN: 0.21, 0.34, 0.40, 0.53 and 0.63; SH: 0.15, 0.22, 0.32, 0.42 and 0.52) before the surface oxygen containing complexes C(O) were qualitatively and semi-quantitatively characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and temperature programmed desorption (TPD). A deconvolution method was applied to analyze the C(O) adsorption in the spectral region of 1800-1000 cm(-1) in the FT-IR spectra, and the results indicated that the type and thermal stability of these functional groups were as follows: carboxylic (1250 K) < phenol (1350 K) < ether/anhydride (1550 K) < lactone/quinone (1650 K). The TPD results demonstrated that more active sites were generated on the particle surface after the oxidative treatment under O2 atmosphere, especially the samples with low conversion degree (J2, S2, and S3), coal type and conversion ratio had small effects on the ratios of metastable stable complexes to stable complexes C-wea(O)/C-str(O) under the experimental conditions. The oxidized char samples were significantly more reactive than the raw char, and per unit mass of each oxidized sample could reduce more NO than raw char during the temperature programmed reduction (TPR) process, and phenol, ether and anhydride were the main reactants participated in the NO reduction reaction under high-temperature condition (1173-1600 K).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available